<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Speak of the City: Amiri Baraka</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oscarbermeo.com/2009/01/i-speak-of-the-city-amiri-baraka/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oscarbermeo.com/2009/01/i-speak-of-the-city-amiri-baraka/</link>
	<description>The online poetics journal of Oscar Bermeo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:25:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: scottwoods</title>
		<link>http://www.oscarbermeo.com/2009/01/i-speak-of-the-city-amiri-baraka/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>scottwoods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oscarbermeo.com/2009/01/i-speak-of-the-city-amiri-baraka/#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Can I also point out that while Baraka&#039;s poem is pedestrian, it is a different strain of pedestrian.  There is &quot;Here is what I see&quot; and there is &quot;here is a list of things I see.&quot;  The difference between the two is that the first, when done poetically, funnels through a lens of the poet&#039;s voice and imagination.  The second is a grocery list.  I&#039;d agree that Alexander&#039;s poem was pedestrian in tone, if not wholly as device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I also point out that while Baraka&#8217;s poem is pedestrian, it is a different strain of pedestrian.  There is &#8220;Here is what I see&#8221; and there is &#8220;here is a list of things I see.&#8221;  The difference between the two is that the first, when done poetically, funnels through a lens of the poet&#8217;s voice and imagination.  The second is a grocery list.  I&#8217;d agree that Alexander&#8217;s poem was pedestrian in tone, if not wholly as device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottwoods</title>
		<link>http://www.oscarbermeo.com/2009/01/i-speak-of-the-city-amiri-baraka/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>scottwoods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oscarbermeo.com/2009/01/i-speak-of-the-city-amiri-baraka/#comment-651</guid>
		<description>You can probably guess what my column will say about it, but I didn&#039;t like the poem or the delivery.  Understand that I am not dogmatically equating &quot;delivery&quot; with full-bore &quot;performance&quot; (though by definition, delivery is performance), so I&#039;m not suggesting Obama should have picked a performance poet.  I don&#039;t think anything was wrong with the idea of picking her.  I do maintain that, while a personal choice, there&#039;s a lot of weight on a poet in that position to represent and she didn&#039;t.  Or rather, she did, but in all the wrong ways.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It also bears noting that PLENTY of people didn&#039;t like Maya Angelou before she even read her inaugural effort and used her effort to suggest why she was wack.  It was mostly poetry-centric jabs, but it was jabs.  Elizabeth is different in that she is taking a lot of non-poetry jabs; non-poets just thought, &quot;she&#039;s boring&quot; and moved on (if they weren&#039;t part of the masses of peopel who moved on literally and figuratively after Obama&#039;s speech anyway).  No one thought Angelou was boring, and I felt that even her inaugural poem, while not her best, was certainly valid and compellingly delivered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can probably guess what my column will say about it, but I didn&#8217;t like the poem or the delivery.  Understand that I am not dogmatically equating &#8220;delivery&#8221; with full-bore &#8220;performance&#8221; (though by definition, delivery is performance), so I&#8217;m not suggesting Obama should have picked a performance poet.  I don&#8217;t think anything was wrong with the idea of picking her.  I do maintain that, while a personal choice, there&#8217;s a lot of weight on a poet in that position to represent and she didn&#8217;t.  Or rather, she did, but in all the wrong ways.</p>
<p>It also bears noting that PLENTY of people didn&#8217;t like Maya Angelou before she even read her inaugural effort and used her effort to suggest why she was wack.  It was mostly poetry-centric jabs, but it was jabs.  Elizabeth is different in that she is taking a lot of non-poetry jabs; non-poets just thought, &#8220;she&#8217;s boring&#8221; and moved on (if they weren&#8217;t part of the masses of peopel who moved on literally and figuratively after Obama&#8217;s speech anyway).  No one thought Angelou was boring, and I felt that even her inaugural poem, while not her best, was certainly valid and compellingly delivered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.oscarbermeo.com/2009/01/i-speak-of-the-city-amiri-baraka/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oscarbermeo.com/2009/01/i-speak-of-the-city-amiri-baraka/#comment-650</guid>
		<description>PEDESTRIAN:  The two-dollar vocabulary work picked up by the blog critics who can&#039;t invent their own shit.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Luckily, I CAN invent some new language.  Check it:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BLOGODEMIA:  The new pseudo-intellectual class of blog critics and &quot;literary professionals&quot; who now claim hold over American poetry.  i.e. Punk mofos who can&#039;t say some something to someone&#039;s face.  See also:  Cabrones.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I didn&#039;t like EA&#039;s poem, but so what.  She doesn&#039;t write the kind of stuff I always dig.  But she&#039;s the one Barack wanted.  Life goes on, haters hate, and pa&#039;l carajo with the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PEDESTRIAN:  The two-dollar vocabulary work picked up by the blog critics who can&#8217;t invent their own shit.</p>
<p>Luckily, I CAN invent some new language.  Check it:</p>
<p>BLOGODEMIA:  The new pseudo-intellectual class of blog critics and &#8220;literary professionals&#8221; who now claim hold over American poetry.  i.e. Punk mofos who can&#8217;t say some something to someone&#8217;s face.  See also:  Cabrones.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t like EA&#8217;s poem, but so what.  She doesn&#8217;t write the kind of stuff I always dig.  But she&#8217;s the one Barack wanted.  Life goes on, haters hate, and pa&#8217;l carajo with the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

